@article{oai:ryotokuji-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000185,
 author = {兎澤, 良輔 and Tozawa, Ryosuke and 長谷川, 美幸 and Hasegawa, Miyuki and 大沼, 亮 and Onuma, Ryo and 外岡, 京子 and Tonooka, Kyoko and 坂上, 昇 and Sakanoue, Noboru and 加藤, 宗規 and Kato, Munenori},
 issue = {7},
 journal = {了德寺大学研究紀要, The Bulletin of Ryotokuji University},
 month = {},
 note = {【目的】関節可動域測定(ROM-T)において，読み取り角度の違いが検者内再現性に及ぼす影響について検討した．
【対象と方法】対象は健常成人100名でROM-Tの測定項目は肩関節内外転中間位および90°外転位での肩関節内旋，外旋，股関節屈曲，伸展，内旋，外旋，背臥位および腹臥位での膝関節屈曲，股関節と膝関節伸展位および90°屈曲位での足関節背屈であり，日本整形外科学会と日本リハビリテーション医学会(1995)による方法に準じて行った．計測は連続3回行い，測定値は1°刻みで読み取った．そして，得られた結果を5°刻みに変換した値と1°刻みで扱った値について級内相関係数［ICC(1,1)］を用いて検討した．
【結果】3回の測定におけるICC(1,1)は，1°刻みの右側で0.887－0.979，左側で0.886－0.976，5°刻みの右側で0.795－0.963，左側で0.820－0.957であった．
【考察】ROM-Tでは結果を5°刻みで扱うことが通例であるが，今回の結果，1°刻みで扱う場合と比較して，検者内再現性が低くなることが考えられた．したがって，5°程度の測定誤差は生じていることは考慮しながらも，1°刻みで扱った方が測定誤差による影響を少なくできる可能性があると考えられた．, [Purpose] This study aimed to examine the reproducibility of measurement of range of motion test (ROM-T) by difference between the reading angles.
[Subjects and Methods] Subjects were 100 healthy adults. Measurement of ROM-T were shoulder joint external rotation, internal rotation both neutral position and shoulder abduction 90°, hip joint flexion and extension, internal rotation, external rotation, knee joint flexion both supine and prone, ankle joint dorsiflexion both knee joint 90°flexion position and extension position. Measurement was three times in a row. And we were reading for 1 degree increments. The results converted to 5 degree increments. Each result were treated statistically of intraclass correlation coefficient［ICC(1,1)］.
 [Results] In this study, three measurements in ICC (1,1), 0.887-0.979 on the right side of the increments 1 degree. It was on the left side 0.886-0.976. 5 degree increments result of 0.795-0.963 was on the right side. It was on the left side 0.820-0.957.
 [Discussion] Currently, ROM-T lists the results in increments of 5 degree. However, this result was considered that as compared with when dealing in increments of 1 degree, in a search reproducibility is low.Therefore, I thought that there is a possibility of reducing the effect of measurement error described the results found in increments 1 degree.},
 pages = {83--88},
 title = {関節可動域測定における角度読み取り方法の違いが検者内再現性に及ぼす影響について},
 year = {2013},
 yomi = {トザワ, リョウスケ and ハセガワ, ミユキ and オオヌマ, リョウ and トノオカ, キョウコ and サカノウエ, ノボル and カトウ, ムネノリ}
}